Jobbik and tigers, and bears! Oh, my!
Jobbik is a Hungarian nationalist party that recently won 20% of the vote. Of course, the mainstream media claims that Jobbik is "neo-nazi". But pretty much ANY nationalist party that is White will be slurred as being "neo-nazi". Of course, nationalism for other people (such as Jews) is good and proper.
Here is the web site of Jobbik. For a "Nazi" party they strangely forgot to include swastikas and pictures of Adolf. They just look like normal people.
http://www.jobbik.com/
Below is a picture of a successful Nationalist Party that won 20% of the vote:
And here is a "Nationalist" organization that will not win 20% of the vote. (Although I must admit that the FBI informant looks pretty cute.)
"we just want an exit" Oh how true. But isn't it interesting that the Cultural Marxist who claim to hate us so much don't want to let us go. The truth is the Cultural Marxist know very well that the only reason why they can have their little experiment in utopianism is because they live in a society created by whites. If the whites every split away the "Ranibow Nation" would sink into cannibalism in about five years.
ReplyDeleteFYI. There's already a debate as to whether cannibalism is illegal in South Africa. The Safety and Security Minister Charles Nqakula back in 2006 stated that cannibalism is not a crime in SA!
DeleteLink: http://www.iol.co.za/news/south-africa/cannibalism-is-not-a-crime-says-nqakula-1.282524#.U0oZ86Nv9pU
In South Africa (like most Black African countries) eating human flesh is commonly dished out by Witch Doctors in potions.
You can even go on a trail walk vacation called "Cannibal Trail".
Link: http://www.sa-venues.com/things-to-do/freestate/cannibal-trail/
The big question is when are SA restaurants going to start having human flesh on the menu as it's been discovered in Anambra, Nigeria.
Link: http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/africa/cannibal-restaurant-with-roasted-human-heads-on-the-menu-shut-down-by-police-9123693.html
Your stand on Israel nationalism would be fine and it's consistent with your nationalistic philosophies. It overlooks one very important consideration; Jews stole Palestine from the indigenous population. What about the Palestinian's nationalistic "rights". Jews claim that area because of the bible? Give me a break. I don't recall during my 16 years of formal education ever reading anywhere that scripture was a real estate road map, If one were to use the same reasoning that Jews use to claim Israel, then Italy could lay claim to most of France and England because Rome conquered those areas 2000 years ago. Put another way; that dog won't hunt.
ReplyDeleteI don't disagree with you, but I think we should let the middle-east sort its own problems.
DeleteAnd, in any case, shouldn't the Jews have the right to a homeland ?
You're right. We are not
ReplyDelete- 1935 Germans
We are not
- 1776 Americans
We are not
- 1860 dixie people
But we aren't either
- 19th century Jews
19th century Jews planned the construction of a Jewish homeland that would be called Israel. The Jews at the time lived as minorities scattered over many countries. They had done so for long and were happy with it. They also ran no danger of dying out. They were a disciplined people that didn't commit miscegenation.
They wanted to go on living as minorities but additionally have a homeland. This homeland didn't need to be particularly big. They wanted to continue living by majority as minorities in the countries of the others, and live at their host's expense.
1.38 - 2:02 of watch?v=FlazkCPqWDM
They didn't want to run their own country at their own expense so it had to be small. They only wanted to run a center that coordinates their international criminal activity. This exposed them to the danger of a razzia by the host country where they have their new center. So the center had to be in a country the Jews have on their own. watch?v=2FdVck03_vc
But we are in a totally different situation. We whites have until recently had a lot of countries on our own. We'd always been in these countries either the dominate majority or lived in the country almost exclusively. We wanted it to stay that way. But some forces change it and made our countries diverse. We are threatened to become a minority we don't want to be and we run danger to die out.
BTW I disagree with what David Duke says about Palestinians.
Delete